The FSU chapter of United Faculty of Florida welcomes new faculty to campus! Learn more about what we do and the benefits of becoming a dues-paying member, and join UFF-FSU.
UFF Bargaining 2024 – Final Agreement
On Monday after an olympic style, five-hour marathon bargaining session, our 16th, the UFF and Board of Trustees came to an agreement on changes to the collective bargaining agreement. Here are the five signed tentative agreement documents.
Opened at the behest of the Board of Trustees bargaining team, “Article 10 Performance Evaluations” with modifications for Post Tenure Review and “Article 21 Other Faculty Rights” with modifications for building air quality maintenance.
Opened by request of the UFF-FSU chapter Negotiating Team, “Article 20 Grievances and Arbitration” with modifications for new Florida Statute prohibiting arbitration in most cases and “Article 22 Sabbatical and Professional Development Leave” to allow non-teaching specialized faculty to take PDL in smaller time periods.
And of course “Article 23 Salaries” which is opened every year as required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement. These articles must be approved by a vote of the faculty and signed by the president to become part of the contract for this 2024-2025 academic year. A full summary of the changes bargained on your behalf will be forthcoming soon.
Bargaining Update, July 31
Dear FSU Colleagues,
On July 31, the two teams met for the fourteenth time. Thanks to all those who attended and gave input!
Please note that we will meet once again today, 2-5pm, to hear the BOT’s response to the proposals we presented.
We presented proposals for the following articles:
· Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that would assure that faculty who were promoted would receive their promotion raises on time. The BOT team has had this MOA since our July 17 meeting. They have not signed it and did not sign it Wednesday.
· Article 10 (Performance Evaluations): We deleted the language the BOT team added, which had merely said that the Post-Tenure Review (PTR) process would follow the law. Because evaluations are a term and condition of employment, we have the right to bargain the process.
· Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) regarding PTR: For our latest proposal, we went back to the BOT team’s last offer from March when the two teams were only bargaining PTR and made some changes that are highlighted in yellow. The primary changes in our proposal are:
o A rating of Unsatisfactory would include disregarding or failing to meet previous formal written advice or incompetence or misconduct as defined in the CBA (Article 16).
o The FEAS report would include not just SPCI reports but also grade distributions and other evidence of effective teaching.
o Substantiated findings of any investigation that would be included in PTR would need to be serious and repeated noncompliance with university policies or applicable laws or regulations within the scope of university employment that resulted in disciplinary action due to misconduct or incompetence.
o The Dean’s report would need to include input from a college faculty committee.
o The Provost’s report would need to include input from a university faculty committee.
o (The chair’s letter had already included participation from a department faculty committee in the last proposal, and that had been agreed to)
Please note that we still believe that PTR as defined by the Board of Governors and adopted by the FSU Board of Trustees is highly problematic as it turns tenure into five-year contracts. We have filed an appeal to the PERC decision that we mentioned in a previous update and will continue to fight to protect our rights as faculty.
· Article 20 (Grievances and Arbitration): For this proposal, Step 3 of the grievance process would still be arbitration, but because the legislature passed a law that prohibits neutral binding arbitration for personnel issues, the arbitration decision for personnel issues would be non-binding, serving as advice to the President, who according to the law is now the final decision-maker.
· Article 23 (Salary): Our salary offer can be found below. The highlighted numbers are changes from the previous offer. This offer demonstrates our interest in reaching agreement.
| Bargaining Salary History 2024 | BOT 11 (last week) | UFF 12 |
| Promotions | 12/15% | 12/15% |
| Sustained Performance Increase (SPI) for Specialized Faculty at the top rank (now every 5 years) | 3% | 3% |
| PTR (Associate Professors who are assigned Meets Expectations) | $4,000 bonus | $4,000 bonus |
| PTR (Associate Professors who are assigned Exceeds Expectations) | $6,000 bonus | $6,000 bonus |
| PTR (Professors who are assigned Meets Expectations) | 3.0% raise | 3.0% raise |
| PTR (Professors who are assigned Exceeds Expectations) | 5.0% raise | 5.0% raise |
| Performance Increase (for all faculty who received higher than Official Concern on most recent annual evaluation) | 2.5% | 2.75% |
| Departmental Merit (based on criteria developed by faculty) | 0.3% | 0.80% |
| Deans’ Merit | 0.2% | 0.10% |
| Market Equity | $500,000 | $600,000 |
| Administrative Discretionary Increases | 0.80 | 0.80% |
We added the minimum salary of $44,000 back into the salary article after the BOT deleted it once again.
Please join us at bargaining today, August 2, from 2–5pm in the FSU Training Center or by Zoom. Please use the regular Zoom link at: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88528923845?pwd=YnRNajhhb01HMVBlQTJDRmRqQlVqdz09#success
And please make your voice heard by joining your faculty union.
All the best,
Scott Hannahs, Research Faculty III, National High Magnetic Field Lab
Jennifer Proffitt, Professor, Communication
Co-Chief Negotiators, UFF-FSU
On behalf of your UFF-FSU Bargaining Team
Bargaining Update, July 24
Dear colleagues,
Our thirteenth bargaining session of this bargaining season was held on Wednesday, July 24. Here’s a brief update on where we are in the process.
After presenting us with their proposals for three articles, the BOT team insisted that all three articles were a package and we could only continue to bargain on all of them at once. After caucusing for a short time, they decided we would need more time to counter on all three articles at once and left for the day. We will meet again next week for them to hear our counters.
Synopsis:
- The only change in the BOT salary offer from their last offer was to increase Performance raise by 0.5% and decrease Departmental Merit by 0.5%, hence no change in the total. Moreover, once more, the BOT team rejected our minimum salary offer of $44,000 per year. The BOT team has been telling us that the faculty making under $44,000 are paid at market rates and that there are no retention problems.
- The BOT did not respond to our Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) proposal to implement promotion salary increases while other issues remain unresolved.
- In response to our proposed MOA on post-tenure review (PTR), they completely rejected the MOA and added one single paragraph to Article 10 Performance Evaluations that the parties will comply with the Board of Governors (BOG) regulation on PTR. We consider this a waiver: they are asking us to give up our rights to bargain over a mandatory subject of bargaining (evaluations). Their proposal would leave PTR completely to the discretion of administrators without criteria and without faculty input and could lead to the dismissal of tenured faculty without recourse. Please note that the header in the linked Article 10 above is wrong. This is the BOT’s proposal.
- Similar to the PTR MOA, the BOT team’s response to our proposal for mediation in lieu of arbitration was to reject it all. The BOT team proposal included the status quo language on arbitration plus adding a paragraph to Article 20 Grievance Procedure and Arbitration saying the parties will comply with Florida Statues that ban binding arbitration in personnel disputes.
Here’s the weekly salary chart.
| Bargaining Salary History 2024 | BOT 10(2 weeks ago) | UFF 10(last week) | BOT 11 |
| Promotions | 12/15% | 12/15% | 12/15% |
| Sustained Performance Increase (SPI) for Specialized Faculty at the top rank (now every 5 years) | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| PTR (Associate Professors who are assigned Meets Expectations) | $4,000 bonus | $5,000 bonus | $4,000 bonus |
| PTR (Associate Professors who are assigned Exceeds Expectations) | $6,000 bonus | $6,000 bonus | $6,000 bonus |
| PTR (Professors who are assigned Meets Expectations) | 3.0% raise | 4.0% raise | 3.0% raise |
| PTR (Professors who are assigned Exceeds Expectations) | 5.0% raise | 5.0% raise | 5.0% raise |
| Performance Increase (for all faculty who received higher than Official Concern on most recent annual evaluation) | 2.0% | 3.0% | 2.5% |
| Departmental Merit (based on criteria developed by faculty) | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| Deans’ Merit | 0.20% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
| Market Equity | $500,000 | $700,000 | $500,000 |
| Administrative Discretionary Increases | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% |
Please join us at bargaining today Wednesday (July 31) from 3–5pm in the FSU Training Center and make your voice heard by joining your faculty union. Please note that the start time, 3pm, is one hour later than usual.
In solidarity,
Arash Fahim, Associate Professor of Mathematics, FSU College of Arts and Sciences
On behalf of your UFF-FSU Collective Bargaining Team
Bargaining Update, July 17
Dear colleagues,
Our twelfth bargaining session of this bargaining season was held on Wednesday, July 17. Here’s a brief update on where we are in the process.
Synopsis:
- We proffered our latest salary offer, but the BOT team did not respond, saying that they had offered as much money as they were authorized to spend. They said that they would need to talk to their higher-ups. We hope to hear something at our next session on Wednesday.
- We proposed a new Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on post-tenure review (PTR). We don’t want to put this in the contract for a variety of reasons, but particularly because a) we are appealing PERC’s terrible decision that curtails faculty bargaining rights; and b) PTR, as conceived by the BOG and BOT, violates provisions in other articles of our contract—articles that are not open for negotiation this year. Neither side should want language in the contract that is still being litigated and that creates internal inconsistencies in the contract.
- We offered to sign a version of Article 10 (Evaluations) that included everything we had negotiated (wins for both sides), except PTR.
- We presented a counteroffer MOA with provisions for mediation in lieu of arbitration. The BOT previously offered mediation only if the union paid for all the costs and only if it was used in very limited circumstances. We see no reason to limit the types of grievances that can be mediated, and we certainly don’t believe that one party should bear all the costs. They seemed surprised that we wanted to use mediation broadly, even though we pointed out that grievances rarely progress past step 2 (to our knowledge, it has happened fewer than three times over the past nine years). We hope to hear a formal response to our proposal next week.
Here’s the weekly salary chart. You can see that we really aren’t very far apart. If we can agree about putting PTR into an MOA for this year and if we can bring the performance (nearly across-the-board) increase closer to the cost-of-living increase and get more money for market equity, I think we can reach agreement on salaries quickly.
| Bargaining Salary History 2024 | BOT 9 (last week) | UFF 10 |
| Promotions | 12/15% | 12/15% |
| Sustained Performance Increase (SPI) for Specialized Faculty at the top rank (now every 5 years) | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| PTR (Associate Professors who are assigned Meets Expectations) | $4,000 bonus | $5,000 bonus |
| PTR (Associate Professors who are assigned Exceeds Expectations) | $6,000 bonus | $6,000 bonus |
| PTR (Professors who are assigned Meets Expectations) | 3.0% raise | 4.0% raise |
| PTR (Professors who are assigned Exceeds Expectations) | 5.0% raise | 5.0% raise |
| Performance Increase (for all faculty who received higher than Official Concern on most recent annual evaluation) | 2.0% | 3.0% |
| Departmental Merit (based on criteria developed by faculty) | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Deans’ Merit | 0.20% | 0.20% |
| Market Equity | $500,000 | $700,000 |
| Administrative Discretionary Increases | 0.80% | 0.80% |
Please join us at bargaining this coming Wednesday (July 24) from 2–5 in the Training Center across from the stadium and make your voice heard by joining your faculty union.
In solidarity,
Michael Buchler, Professor of Music Theory, FSU College of Music
On behalf of your UFF-FSU Collective Bargaining Team